Problem
This piece will need to represent, in a meaningful way, the structure and
function of DNA. The purpose of this representation is two-fold. As a metaphor
it will serve as an instructional aid for the instruction of basic biological
concepts. As an artistic endeavor it will explore the relationship between
the rigid chromosomal code dictating our physical design and function and
the intangible consciousness that seems to belie the very code from which
each of us, and indeed every living organism, is built.
Concept
My conceptual inspiration is drawn from Richard Dawkins’ book, The
Selfish Gene. The core idea in Dawkins’ writing is that the primary
agent of evolutionary development and selection is the gene. Our genes began
their existence as simple chemical compounds with the improbable ability to
replicate themselves. These replicators gradually became more complex and
their chemical resources became scarce, forcing them to compete for their
survival. Dawkins argues that the two primary survival mechanisms became the
development of protective barriers and the eventual cooperation between replicators,
which led to the development of colonies of replicators working together for
their survival. Whatever became of the replicators? Where are they now?
Now they swarm in huge colonies, safe inside gigantic lumbering robots, sealed off from the outside world, communicating with it by tortuous indirect routes, manipulating it by remote control. They are in you and in me; they created us, body and mind; and their preservation is the ultimate rationale for our existence. They have come a long way, those replicators. Now they go by the name of genes, and we are their survival machines.*
There is an inherent tension between this explanation for our existence and the way that we experience our existence. Genetic code does not account for emotion, creativity, friendship, or any of the other subtleties of our day to day existence. It is this tension that I hope to explore.
*Richard Dawkins. The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, 1976), pg. 21