All popular music (and all folk music, by definition), essentially,
if not legally, exists in a public domain. Listening to pop music isn't a
matter of choice. Asked for or not, we're bombarded by it. In its most insidious
state, filtered to an incessant bass-line, it seeps through apartment walls
and out of the heads of walk people. Although people in general are making
more noise than ever before, fewer people are making more of the total noise;
specifically, in music, those with megawatt PA's, triple platinum sales, and
heavy rotation. Difficult to ignore, pointlessly redundant to imitate, how
does one not become a passive recipient?
– John Oswald
Sometimes, I'll put a loop on and let it play for, like,
two or three days. I've done it before. When you do something like that, you
get to hear all different parts and pieces and elements of it that you never
really heard before.... It probably sounds strange to a lotta people, but
you get to hear stuff that the musician didn't try to put in there. You know
what I mean? It's just in there.
– DJ Kool Akiem
Underscoring [the search for an answer to "what is popular
music?"] is the academic imperative that music, if we are to understand
it in its present travails, has to be apprehended and analysed in terms completely
different from those we currently employ. It has to be understood in terms
of its means and relations of production, in terms of the specific social
and political forces which enclose it and in terms of its role as a language—which
is to say, in terms of its cultural and aesthetic meaning. Certainly these
forces give rise to forms, but plastic and protean forms. Surely these forms
can be comprehended in terms of the forces which produce them, but the forces
can not be discovered and contained by the forms considered as little worlds
unto themselves; forms are effects, not causes, and it is the shaping forces
that we need to apprehend, not merely the parade of shapes.
– Chris Cutler
In Zen they say: If something is boring for two minutes,
try it for four. If still boring, try it for eight, sixteen, thirty-two, and
so on. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all but very interesting.
– John Cage
It comes to me natural, it comes to me easy
I just lay back and let the big beat lead me
– Jungle Brothers
Non-Western music in general and African, Indonesian and
Indian music in particular will serve as new structural models for Western
musicians. Not as new models of sound. (That's the old exoticism trip.) Those
of us who love the sounds will hopefully just go and learn how to play these
musics.…
Music schools will be resurrected through offering instruction in the practice
and theory of all the world's music. Young composers/performers will form
all sorts of new ensembles growing out of one or several or the world's musical
traditions.…
The pulse and the concept of clear tonal center will re-emerge as basic sources
of new music
– Steve Reich
La la la la la la la la
La la la la la la la la
La la la la la la la la
La la la la la la la la
I just can’t get you out of my head
– Kylie Minogue
Perhaps the single most important feature of the twentieth-century
musical culture is its gradual but pervasive African-Americanization.…Given
its ubiquity, black pop music would seem to be the element most clearly responsible
for converting our collective sense of time from tortured heroic narratives
to cycles of kinetic pleasure. As Prince sings, "There's joy in repetition!"
One can even perceive a strong influence of African based patterning in both
the experimental music and rock of the 1960s—the time when the influence
of Asian practices is most explicit. The blues and its descendants had predisposed
both rockers and minimalist composers to experience time in this way, even
if their attraction to Buddhism of Hindu mysticism led them to propose a somewhat
different lineage.
– Susan McClary
I got kicks on the one, seven and eleven
Snares on the five and thirteen
Rhymes on time and that's the given
We're hot on the disco scene. Check it, check it.
– The Beastie Boys
The psychology of art has always favored fragmentary "theft"
in a way which does not engender a loss to the owner. In fact, most artists
speak freely about the amount of stuff they have stolen at one time or another.
In the realm of ideas, techniques, styles, etc. most artists know that stealing
(or call it 'being influenced' if you want to sound legitimate) is not only
OK, but desirable and even crucial to creative evolution. This proven route
to progress has prevailed among artists since art began and will not be denied.
To creators, it is simply obvious in their own experience.
Now some will say there is a big difference between stealing ideas, techniques,
and styles which are not easily copyrighted, and stealing actual material,
which is easily copyrighted. However, aside from the copyright deterrence
factor which now prevails throughout our law-bound art industries, we can
find nothing intrinsically wrong with an artist deciding to incorporate existing
art "samples" into their own work. The fact that we have economically
motivated laws against it does not necessarily make it an undesirable artistic
move. In fact, this kind of theft has a well-respected tradition in the arts
extending back to the Industrial Revolution.
– Negativland